The Pandemic 2020 New Class Announcement! Register Now!

The Pandemic 2020 New Class Announcement! Register Now!

by Eugene Passofaro -
Number of replies: 9

Dear Friends,

  I am Beginning lectures this week for the New Online Class Series (opening today) The Pandemic 2020!!!  

If you want to know more and share more, this is the course for you!  You will discover the most important additions of spiritual science to your understanding of current events. 

The Online Class includes Discussions, Videos, Lectures, and Word Definitions and Article links. 

Register Here

Life-time Enrollment feature too!  

69 words

Re: Where Did Covid-19 Originate?

by Laura Turner -

holy moly. I'm speechless, because this makes so much sense. Thanks for posting this, Paul!!

In addition, here's a good article re the U.S. from an M.D. who's a member of the non-political US medical association the AAPS Amer Assn of Physicians and Surgeons. (I had no idea this group existed before a couple of weeks ago--thank you Ron Paul for mentioning them)

69 words

Re: Where Did Covid-19 Originate?

by Eugene Passofaro -
Thank you Paul for this information and links! I will research them tomorrow. I am sure other will too.

19 words

Re: Where Did Covid-19 Originate?

by Paul Ntoumos -
I am entering a bit late in the conversation. I have been following the development of SARS-COV-2 since February 2020.
Here is some additional information that sheds further light to this drama.
From someone who has had some inside connections with the CCP back in MArch 2020:
I can now explain where the SARS-CoV-2 was created, who created it, why she created it, and why it is called “novel coronavirus”.
US AAMRID funded studies that showed the molecule pictured could treat a variety of RNA viruses. Somehow the Israeli company Gilead claimed the patent (even though the development costs were paid for by the American taxpayer) and called it remdesivir.
Gilead field for patents to use this for coronaviruses, including SARS-Cov.
When Chinese researchers saw this, they got the Chinese government to hold off on granting the patent to and Zhengli Shi developed SARS-CoV-2.
This is called “novel coronavirus” in the patent application because patents must be “new, novel, and nonobvious to a practitioner of the art”.
By calling it “novel coronavirus”, the architects of the global pandemic (who had been funded by US NHI and US AID as well as the Chinese military and Chinese Academy of Sciences) have sought to generate a Middle Kingdom sized fortune by pirating a patent for a molecule whose discovery was paid for by American taxpayers.
The developer of SARS-CoV-2, Zhengli Shi, under penalty of perjury in multiple countries, put herself as the inventor of remdesivir for the treatment of the virus she created that has now infected probably a million humans and that has killed over 10,000.
Since I am a policy advisor, here is my policy advice:
1. No more patents for molecules.
2. No more patents for viruses.
3. Capital punishment for creators of novel viruses who try to file patents for the treatment.
4. US government should demand the extradition of Zhengli Shi and when China refuses try her in absentia and if convicted send China bill for the damages.
5. All parties who funded the work of Zhengli Shi to be identified publicly and terminated from their jobs with no pension and be open to civil and criminal charges. They can be defended by lawyers but their decision making processes should be documented for historical purposes, for the same reasons as the Nuremberg Trials were conducted and then the defendants executed.
6. All parties who sought to suppress the publication of articles revealing the role of Zhengli Shi should be terminated and treated the same as those who funded her work in 5. above.
6. No more funding for bioweapon a research and all bioweapon destroyed.
7. Apology from the Chinese government to the people of earth for their role in activity suppressing this information for months and still allowing this farce to continue.
8. Invalidation of all Chinese patents that are similarly pirated and ejection from the Berne Convention.
9. Apology from the US government for its role in funding Zhengli Shi.””
Alex Lightman , Policy Advisor & Futurist

Here is a link to Zheng-Li Shi's research while affiliated with Wuhan Institute Of Virology and other places

535 words

Re: Ron Paul An Ex Doctor Speaks About Vaccines and Covid-19

by Laura Turner -

I'm only half facetious in my statement, because a good law is an attempt to legislate morality and give guidance to those who can't govern themselves. So, why not a basic law regarding that kind of perjury by an elected or appointed government "agent" "official" "worker" (bee), statesman?

Statesman is the word I prefer, because it's one that elevates the human who has accepted this role and responsibility, in other words a genuine leader. But to do this we do need to have a society that values the individual, the expression of speech (this is where the "right to free speech" is lost for those who lie), the value of creativity (artists, especially muse initiates), and understands/selects what grows and nurtures us as human beings (instead of what leads to degeneration/hardening and animalism).

135 words

Re: Ron Paul An Ex Doctor Speaks About Vaccines and Covid-19

by Laura Turner -
what a wonderful idea Dr. Paul has suggested: any candidate must take an oath that his or her public statement is true!! Put Bill Gates on public display and try him for high treason against humanity, not just U.S. where he still is a "citizen". Let's start the Healthy Lives Matter movement!!

53 words

Re: Where Did Covid-19 Originate?

by Laura Turner -
oh my. God bless these techies for doing this, and making the info available.

14 words

Where Did Covid-19 Originate?

by Eugene Passofaro -
Where Did Covid-19 Originate?  

It is now a very important question for China is asking apologies from the USA President for claiming it came from their laboratory in Wuhan. Dr. Shi Zhengli is head of the laboratory. Had she possibly a hand in removing any evidence to connect the Chinese Laboratory she was working to create a Deadly Virus?  What is remarkable is that the Nobel Prize winning scientist Montagnier claims his testing of the virus showed a sequence of protein which was man-made and was in the Covid protein chain sequence revealing there was no other possible way it could have formed. Most certainly, to make it more effective the Bat virus was crucial to complete the sequences of the viral material. Here is a very important article below,  and the author claims to have done the mathematical formulas necessary to reveal if there is evidence the records of the protein genome had been intentionally changed after the virus broke out and spread in the wider world.  The article is presented for your own consideration and research. 


This article was originally published in LifeSite News, May 15th, 2020

Dr. Shi Zhengli, known as China’s batwoman, was worried.  Her creation, a highly infectious coronavirus, had leaked from her lab in October.  Early efforts to stop the widening circle of infections had failed.  It had spread like wildfire through the densely populated city of Wuhan.

The Communist authorities were also worried that the source of the epidemic would be traced back to the Wuhan lab.  To muddy the waters, on January 3rd,  China’s National Health Commission ordered all biolabs in China to destroy not only the samples of the SARS-CoV-2 that they had isolated from those infected, but also the genetic sequencing of the virus’ RNA strand.  Dr. Shi must have been only too happy to cover her own tracks—evidence suggests she had already started doing so–by destroying the evidence of the deadly virus’ actual origins in her lab.

It was the equivalent of trying to wipe the fingerprints from a gun that had just been used to commit murder. 

The “gun” itself couldn’t be destroyed, however.  In fact, the murder weapon used was busy replicating itself by the billions within each and every person who came down with the China Virus.

 Dr. Shi and her superiors, undoubtedly including Major General Chen Wei, the head of the PLA’s bioweapons program, knew that the coronavirus she had assembled using recombinant technology was so different from other known coronaviruses that it would raise suspicions.  None of the other known beta-coronaviruses, the family from which her “backbone” coronavirus came from, had anything resembling the genetic sequence she had inserted to make it more infectious to humans.

To reinforce the “Wet Market” cover story, namely, that this new pathogen had come from nature and not from her lab, something had to be done. And it had to be done quickly, since by then the China Coronavirus had spread to the rest of the world.  Anger against China for its lack of transparency about the origins and characteristics of the virus was growing. 

Dr. Shi decided to “discover” a new bat coronavirus that was very similar to the one she had created.  That “discovery” would prove that coronaviruses similar to SARS-CoV-2 were found in nature, and so deflect the growing suspicion that she had engineered it in her lab.  

The similarity between the two coronaviruses—including their common ability to infect humans–would greatly reinforce her story that the SARS-CoV-2 had jumped from a bat to a human, perhaps through some intermediate species at the Wuhan wet market. 

So, all Dr. Shi had to do was sit down before her computer keyboard, open a word file, and begin to fabricate the SARS-CoV-2 analogue that she would claim to have found in nature seven years before. All she had to do was type in the genetic sequence of her own creation, SARS-CoV-2, changing a few nucleotides now and again to mimic the “random mutations” that regularly occur in nature.

She could easily have completed the “data entry” part of her task in a day, since all she was doing was entering in a string of letters alternating between the four nucleotides, A, U, G, and C.  And coronaviruses contain less than 30,000 different nucleotides.

Dr. Shi registered her new virus on January 27th, 2020, with the National Center for Biotechnology Information (NCBI) of the U.S. National Institutes of Health, the customary repository for such information.  She called it RaTG-13, Ra for Rhinolophus affinis, the Latin name of the Intermediate Horseshoe Bat, and 13 for 2013, the year she supposedly “discovered” it.

A lot of people have been taken in by Dr. Shi’s clever “discovery,” which is looking more and more like a forgery. No one else has independently verified its existence.  No other lab has a sample of it, and no one else has ever sequenced it.  And of course, they likely never will, because more and more evidence suggests that it exists only in a string of letters on her computer. 

It was a brilliant scheme, and it almost succeeded.  The Chinese virology community—following new, strict Party guidelines—has published a flurry of studies suggesting that the existence of RaTG-13 proves that SARS-CoV-2 came from nature.  They claim that other “first cousins” of the China Coronavirus will soon be found to exist in nature if we just keep looking.  They do genomic analyses showing that RaTG-13 and SARS-CoV-2 are 96% identical throughout the whole sequence of the viral genome.  They calculate that the two share a common ancestor a few decades back.

Actually, the only thing the two virus genomes have in common is Dr. Shi herself, who engineered the one and appears to have fabricated the other.    

As clever as Batwoman is, however, she did not commit the perfect deception.  She left behind a few key clues that reveal, as clearly as fingerprints on a murder weapon, what she was up to.

One blogger, writing at Nerd Has Power, has brilliantly teased these findings out of the data. The blogger’s efforts can be read here if you have a free afternoon and a strong math background.  I offer here a summary of one of the blogger’s critiques, in the hope of making the blogger’s general line of argument accessible to the layman. Because he published his raw data, I and others have been able to check and verify his work.  I offer here a summary of one of the blogger’s critiques, in the hope of making the blogger’s general line of argument accessible to the layman.

An Impossible Ratio:  As viruses evolve, they mutate.  That is to say, one of the four nucleotides is randomly replaced by another.  Most of these random mutations do not produce changes in the amino acids that make up the protein.  Such mutations are called “synonymous”, since the three-nucleotide “codon” still codes for the same amino acid despite the change.  Like a synonym in a thesaurus, it “looks” different but “means”—in terms of the amino acid and resulting protein—the same thing.

But then there are “non-synonymous” mutations.  These are mutations that do change the resulting amino acid and hence the configuration of the resulting protein.  In nature, the ratio of synonymous to non-synonymous is approximately 5:1. 

Here’s where Dr. Shi got into trouble.  When typing in the genomic sequence of her “discovery” she made way too many non-synonymous changes at the beginning.  Then, one-third of the way through the sequence, she apparently realized her error.  After that, she made way too few non-synonymous changes.  So while the entire genome has the expected 5:1 ratio, there are stretches where the ratio is closer to 2:1, and other long stretches where it is as high as 44:1.

Nature’s mutations are random.  Dr. Shi’s “mutations” are not. Dr. Lawrence Sellin has calculated that the odds that her “mutations” occurred naturally in just one area—the critical spike protein–at almost ten million to one.     

If RaTG-13 is merely a strategic deception, as I believe it is, then what real coronavirus did Dr. Shi enhance in “Gain-of-Function” research to create the highly infectious SARS-CoV-2?  Evidence suggests that a coronavirus from a People’s Liberation Army biolab may have played this role.  

If Dr. Shi’s research was in any way connected with the PLA’s bioweapons research program, this would go a long way towards explaining China’s bizarre behavior – the secrecy, the serial lying, the brutal quarantine, the persecution of whistle-blowers, the seeding of the virus around the world, and the furious rejection by Beijing of the idea of an international commission to investigate the origin and spread of the disease.  It all seems wildly overwrought, even by the standards of a conspiratorial Communist Party whose leaders suffer from a pathological paranoia. 

Be that as it may, there is one thing about Dr. Shi’s research that we do know with absolute, ironclad certainty: The U.S. was helping to fund it.  From 2013 onward, the National Institute of Allergies and Infectious Diseases, run by the now-famous Dr. Anthony Fauci, gave $7.4 million for research involving gain-of-function work and collecting and studying bat coronaviruses, $600,000 of which went to the Wuhan Institute of Virology.  Much of the rest went to other labs in China. 

If Dr. Fauci was as familiar with the Chinese Communist Party as he is with viruses, he would not have sent the Wuhan Institute of Virology one thin dime. He would have known that the PRC has a long-running program to develop bioweapons. He would have concluded that China’s only BSL-4 high containment lab was the obvious place to carry out at least some of this research.  And he definitely did know that the “Gain-of-Function” research he was funding had the potential to create “Pathogens of Pandemic Potential” that might not be used for peaceful ends.

Apparently none of these considerations ever crossed his mind.

Now that Western intelligence services have concluded that SARS-CoV-2 probably is a man-made chimera that leaked from a lab — a lab that he was funding — you might think that Dr. Fauci would be inclined to reevaluate the role he played in this global debacle.

Instead, he continues to tell us that there is “no scientific evidence the coronavirus was made in a Chinese lab” and that there is “no evidence” that it leaked from the lab.

It is a sad end to a career that was at least long, if not particularly illustrious.

1753 words